In the mid-1970s, the Pictures Generation artists re-used existing images in an appropriative approach. In a similar way, which could be called “Pictures 2.0”, Anne Neukamp selects on the internet—from websites such as Clipart or 3D Models, which provide ready-made drawings with simplified lines and digital symbols—generic shapes that later become the subjects of her paintings. For this new series, she has chosen pictograms of mirrors with basic shapes, sometimes even somewhat pixelated—images that might have been created by the graphic designer Susan Kare, the creator of the first Apple icons in the early 1980s. The A4 prints of these generic representations of mirrors cover a whole wall of Anne Neukamp’s studio in Berlin, while on the contiguous walls, these pictograms are enlarged and recreated on a noble linen canvas. Announcement testifies to this change of scale: the small pictogram pinned to the wall becomes the main subject of a composition measuring 2.8 metres in height and 1.6 metres in width. Similarly, the pieces of the broken mirror in Fall appear disproportionate due to the painting’s large format (2.2 m). Besides its imposing size, each mirror features formal characteristics that are just as unsettling, due to their digital origin.

Anne Neukamp’s mirrors make no reference to reality. The artist uses them because these objects produce images and, what’s more, representations directly and immediately created by reality. But in these paintings, the mirrors only reflect precisely that which cannot be represented: abstraction. The mirrors in Announcement and Tilt, outlined in black like a picture frame, show purely geometric abstractions, created by diagonal, parallel white and blue stripes. The same stripes, of various blues, cover the surfaces of “mirror-paintings” in Adjustment and Revision, while the shimmering surfaces of Sprout and Incident are represented by blue gradients. If we go by the semiologist Charles Sanders Peirce’s symbol classification, the sign presented by a mirror, the reflection, is a clue, if not a mega-clue since it directly shows reality. Yet here, it seems to have lost this clue-like dimension since it shows nothing from reality, neither body nor object, but abstract shapes. The mirror, too, is affected by this loss of reality, since it is nothing but a mere pictogram. It is as if Anne Neukamp’s paintings were a celebration of the icon’s revenge on the clue, or at least pointed it out.